3 player Casino Monop crooked %

thecannonball89 · Post by **thecannonball89** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:02 am

£30 - £40 avrage on a 25pounder.

harry13.50 · Post by **harry13.50** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:03 am

psxcity wrote:86% is over 10,000 pays but its not a true reflection,,
its not 86% paid out. its 86% offered ie you win £5 gamble and lose. the £5 it offered goes towards the 86% even though you didnt get it

Eh ?

Ive never heard of a machine making percentage that way.

JG · Post by JG » Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:48 am

Pure nonsense. Also there are no gambles, as such, on a casino Monopoly.
All these people that bang on about whooopedy doo 50p stake is so much better, must be some antidotes, anecdotes, antithingymys surely?

DildoDez · Post by **DildoDez** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:21 pm

psxcity wrote:86% is over 10,000 pays but its not a true reflection,,
its not 86% paid out. its 86% offered ie you win £5 gamble and lose. the £5 it offered goes towards the 86% even though you didnt get it

Nonsense - hence how machines are progressive and respond to being forced.

psxcity · Post by **psxcity** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:20 pm

Nonsense - hence how machines are progressive and respond to being forced.

based on what? the fact the m/c can be forced?? sure certain m/c's can.but that wasnt the question,the question was how does a m/c work out its %

grandslam88 · Post by **grandslam88** » Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:05 pm

GaryChandler wrote:There's loads of fucked chips for these, i remember playing propably about £250 worth's of credits through one and only getting one hold and drop fiver and i think one nudge in fiver how wrong is that.

this has been happening since the P3 back in 2004, this happend even on the emptyable versions from the P3 onwards . All of a sudden it would lock up. It would block hold wins on the bottom, except the bars and you would only get a nudge win every 50 in or so with the odd game.

I noticed once you got a feature via a hold and it gave JP then everything went back to normal. When i was doing the last of the p3 's it did this every now and again and i was on it for ages around 100 down if it happend.

Matt Vinyl · Post by **Matt Vinyl** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:54 am

its not 86% paid out. its 86% offered ie you win £5 gamble and lose. the £5 it offered goes towards the 86% even though you didnt get it

Hmm, like the above posters, I doubt that would be the case. If it 'was' the case (and I'm speaking generally here, I know nothing about lo-techs) then, as also mentioned above, forcing would not be viable and 'surely' the percentage would 'always' decrease over time if you forced it:

£10 in, £5 win offered, gambled, lost.
£10 in, £5 win offered, gambled, lost.
£10 in, £5 win offered, gambled, lost.
£10 in, £5 win offered, gambled, lost.

That would 'not' keep the percentage level, it would reduce constantly.

Out of interest, where did you come by this information / theory?

thecannonball89 · Post by **thecannonball89** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:25 pm

Gamble? monoply? new to me....

Mattb · Post by **Mattb** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:57 pm

Yeah think people are confused here!

Matt Vinyl · Post by **Matt Vinyl** » Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:01 pm

Just to quote myself:

I know nothing about lo-techs

I was referring generally to the post above about how %'s are 'supposedly' worked out.