Union Jackpots - Mad Money Monster
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:33 pm
This reminds me of the old BWB machines.
£100 in. Still no jackpot. Managed to get numbers adding up to Extra Life. But because I had 3 in a row, it only gave me the feature start.
I think this has a long way to go before release!
EDIT: The best bug yet. 2 nudges to jackpot... take NEAREST WIN. It decides to step up instead for a £4 win. Imagine how raging you'd be if this happened in real life!
£100 in. Still no jackpot. Managed to get numbers adding up to Extra Life. But because I had 3 in a row, it only gave me the feature start.
I think this has a long way to go before release!
EDIT: The best bug yet. 2 nudges to jackpot... take NEAREST WIN. It decides to step up instead for a £4 win. Imagine how raging you'd be if this happened in real life!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:33 pm
It isn't without merit, and I take my hat off to Mr Clayton for getting this far. Unfortunately he might have shot himself in the foot by releasing it to all and sundry at this stage.
My final beef then I'm going to uninstall it... there isn't a jackpot / jackpot repeater on the top row. So after £120 in, I assumed SUPER SERIES was el gordo... when I finally got it, it gave the princely sum of £12.
My final beef then I'm going to uninstall it... there isn't a jackpot / jackpot repeater on the top row. So after £120 in, I assumed SUPER SERIES was el gordo... when I finally got it, it gave the princely sum of £12.
- Matt Vinyl
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:56 pm
- Location: Lost in the outback, Bryan
I had the numbers that should've given Extra Life, but three in a row gave me start.£100 in. Still no jackpot. Managed to get numbers adding up to Extra Life. But because I had 3 in a row, it only gave me the feature start.
I think this has a long way to go before release!
EDIT: The best bug yet. 2 nudges to jackpot... take NEAREST WIN. It decides to step up instead for a £4 win. Imagine how raging you'd be if this happened in real life!
Also, your second point (well, third really) I wonder if they state anywhere "Only Highest Win Paid"?
Well, my points on this one are:
- Great graphics, although having some experience myself, it appears that some of the 'on state' lamps are a little out of line with the equivalent 'off state' lamp. In other words, the lamp appears to move a pixel or so to the left, right, whatever when it 'flashes'.
- Sort that Taxi out fellas! Could you not utilise most of the code that was used for the Skillstop, but just have it change direction when it reaches a random/pre-determined point?
- No Jackpot 'obviously' available from the feature game. Is this a bug, whereby the feature is set to £10jp play, but the main game is set to £15jp? I only say this because I remember Mr. Clayton stating that you could change stake/JP ratio. Maybe this has not been fully implemented as yet?
- I don't feel that there's enough to it to keep the seasoned player (I guess your target audience?) engaged and interested for any significant period of time? Chuck in a few extra things like, I don't know, red nudges (fruit at the top position of each reel can be nudged down and that win spins in - easy to regulate via the coding). Maybe a superhold that chucks itself in now and then in reel play. Even a bit of the old PCB 'I can forsee the future', whereby the player can then make a decision knowing what the next reels spin will yield.
- Does 'Added Extra' ever give more than 4?
I hope that comes across as constructive and not a lot of 'knocks' against what you've worked (obviously very hard!) on...
Ta,
M.
"And do you ever contradict yourself, Minister?" "Well, yes and no..."
I think some of you guys are being pretty unfair. If you think you're going to get any closer to a real AWP feel than this sort of thing then you're deluded. It's a SIMULATION of a singular machine. It's a lot closer to the shite on Ladbrokes to be fair.
I also can't believe people are complaining about the size of the jackpot. 25p/£15 doesn't seem unreasonable to me. If you want to spin for 20p and have the chance of winning £10k you'll have to play random 5 reel games with progressives. What exactly do you think is a reasonable jackpot if 60x stake isnt?? perhaps it could be pushed to 100x but not any more.
I do think it's a bit unproffessional to release a game full of bugs for the general public to test. Test it yourselves then release a completed game.
I also can't believe people are complaining about the size of the jackpot. 25p/£15 doesn't seem unreasonable to me. If you want to spin for 20p and have the chance of winning £10k you'll have to play random 5 reel games with progressives. What exactly do you think is a reasonable jackpot if 60x stake isnt?? perhaps it could be pushed to 100x but not any more.
I do think it's a bit unproffessional to release a game full of bugs for the general public to test. Test it yourselves then release a completed game.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 5:25 pm