On A Roll

toothless11 · Post by **toothless11** » Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:50 pm

Actually so was i! lol Phil the power was playing shit but came through.

Coaster, ages ago they had a bucket loads and RTB, but now only a RTB and MS both chipped.

Does chicago rock have a bucket loads in there? chipped or unchipped?

COASTERDESIGNERPRO1 · Post by **COASTERDESIGNERPRO1** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:47 am

I have only actually glanced through the window as i was going shopping. So i don't know if it is chipped or not.

Matt Vinyl · Post by **Matt Vinyl** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:50 am

Back On Topic: Played an On A Roll for the last 3-4 months now and it is so close to a Jackpot Gems it's almost cheeky that they've released a game pretty much 'exactly' the same as another...

Anyone noticed that these newer Red breeds of this format rarely do the big tops? Moreover, they seem to do 2 or 3 JP boards in a row? Currently still loving GADD and Invincible for almost 'defo' £75 toppers...

Mattb · Post by **Mattb** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:21 pm

Not sure i agree about Invincible.....or SA for that matter.

For me, the most reliable big top features have always been from reds with fruit steps. So any of DNA/LAB/GADD/X Rated etc would be better if you ask me.

SA/Invincible seem to have more of a staggered streak a lot of the time. Same with Pulsation etc

Matt

Matt Vinyl · Post by **Matt Vinyl** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:41 pm

Ah, SA I certainly wouldn't put in to that category as it does seem to do more of a staggered streak (sounds like a naked drunk running somewhere!)

The only reason I have included Invicible in that is because I've only played it four times, and each of those times had a £75 top. (Always from the name fill and then redding-up all the features, which can take a while!!)

nigeswindon25 · Post by **nigeswindon25** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:39 pm

this [edit-Invincible - MattyV] has just arrived in my local which i played yester day.35 in for a flat 25 top
so decided to recycled and another 20 which i finally lit the name for the im and reading back on here knocked out all the features until red then went up top.guttingly another 25.continued for another top off number runner 25 top again then gambled up from low down on cash for yet another 25 top
couple red wins and a number runner for just over a 100 for 75 in
didnt play too badly to be hinest and had half a dozen number runners but continualy raped me on super streak gamble
just a bit bummed with getting 4 flat tops.one 50 could of made a big diff to what i might of made

CrosbyRules · Post by **CrosbyRules** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:48 pm

Think you replied to the wrong post lol! This is for On A Roll, not Invincible mate!

Matt Vinyl · Post by **Matt Vinyl** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:51 pm

Think he might have been replying to me, where I er, went, erm, slightly off topic!

(I've edited it to make it clearer!)

CrosbyRules · Post by **CrosbyRules** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:52 pm

Oh right, me being dumb and not re-reading the previous page!

nigeswindon25 · Post by **nigeswindon25** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 6:33 pm

sorry yer was in reply to matt i think was reading the posts and didnt realise i wasnt really posting in the right topic soz

toothless11 · Post by **toothless11** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:01 pm

I agree with matt V here, i believe SA, Invincible and LABs have brilliant streak profiles. Its hard to get but they normally guarantee £50s or £75s.

DNA, x - rated are also V, V good but have nowhere near the streak potential as SA etc etc.

I also agree that on the roll looks so similar to JP Gems, if you saw it from 10 metres away you would be sure it was a JP Gems. The streaks and game play have changed on these as well, i remember the JP gems used to show red features all the time but rarely do now.

Reds just seem they have changed their gameplay... red features mean nothing on some fruits E.g. Sub Zero, Kings Ransom - Weird.

Has anyone seen the new release from Red... its called Mass Attack... i think im so lucky down here in the south!...i Gets all the new m/cs

Tom

Mattb · Post by **Mattb** » Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:37 pm

SA is very hit and miss though, and can cost a bomb sometimes. They can streak crazy, but its more risky.

At least on a DNA you know it'll never cost you the earth to get to Big Money - and it streaks like clockwork (plus you can rake in DNA wins without affecting top pot). Still my favourite ever red, but when i find them nowadays they just look dated - fruits/graphics etc look old compared to LAB and things!

Matt

Dynamike · Post by **Dynamike** » Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:09 am

Mattb wrote:SA is very hit and miss though, and can cost a bomb sometimes. They can streak crazy, but its more risky.

At least on a DNA you know it'll never cost you the earth to get to Big Money - and it streaks like clockwork

They are exactly like clockwork, it's brilliant!

Lost a couple recently though - got a Casino Crazy and Cash Blast instead.

toothless11 · Post by **toothless11** » Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:24 am

I agree that the block at SS to MS on SA is horrible! DNAs are still one of my favouite reds though. I only take on SA now if showing reds properly and not fluking a SSS or number runner. Ive had number runner for £10 and SSS and it still take £100 for a top but then ive had £1s - £10s in for £75s so its all hit and miss really.

That sums up reds though, also this new red i saw.... Mass Attack i think, when showing red features it doesn't mean that the m/cs is 'there'... they are completely random! This will be a pain in the arse!!!!

Matt Vinyl · Post by **Matt Vinyl** » Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:59 am

What is Mass Attack a clone of matey? I'm guessing 'Invincible' as it has the same number of letters in the name, and this prevents software changes being needed etc!

Red - Will you please update your website!!!!