deano8177 wrote:If there was no mallet heads out there a lot of us players would be skint.
the maths is wrong but the thrust is right: zero would= 78% of zero.
this is very obvious but: ateotd, these marvels of engineered design are sited to make money for the developers/distributors/manufacturers/landlords & government.
given all the overheads involved with site engineers/collectors/tax/business rate/development/marketing, it is a wonder that there are enough ordinaries to keep them viable.
ive not always agreed with deano ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, but this time he is spot on ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
however cynical and horrible it sounds , ,,,,,,,,,***WE NEED PEOPLE TO LOSE , SO THAT WE CAN WIN***
the reality is , we live off the misery of others ............. we do not live in a candy floss fluffy bunny world.
you have two choices ,,,,,,,,,,
1, stop being a pro player through guilt , and do something more socially acceptable for work.
2, get over it.
bottom line , i do truly truly truly sympathise with hardened addicts , they need free professional help ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, but everyone's situation is different , and im never gonna feel sorry for the twat who blows all his money on gambling , when he knew full well beforehand that that money was needed to put food on the table for his family ( i realise gambling is an illness , but fuck you , you people make me sick )
despite increased advertisements in the media etc ,promising free this that and the other,,,,,,,,,,,, the old adage still rings true ''nobody puts a gun to your head and MAKES you gamble.
so for me the guilt trip stops there ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ive said this before ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, maybe there should be a lot more government regulation ,,,,,,,,,,,, but the reality is that as long as the men at the top are lining their pockets NOTHINGS GONNA CHANGE. ,,,,,,,,, so people need to regulate themselves . ,,,,,,,,,, cynical ? ,,,,,, harsh ? ,,,,,,,,,,,, yes , but true.
now then ,,,,,,,,, i realise i may get a lot of stick from you guys in your reples ,
but i will only accept comments from casuals ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, any pro player that wants to disagree with me , better hang up his 50bags before throwing stones.
Not sure of the name but did see a beardy fruity last night that held the cashpot on 25p stake at £25. I assume 50p may be £50. If they can do it with cp why not jp?
I agree with the multistake jackpot idea. I would make the stake:win ratio 1:100, therefore 10p/£10, 25p/£25, 50p/£50, £1/£100. Then the play style stays largely the same.
"I think you're going to go away with a lot of money."