Personally I feel that if more players took cannonballs stance and gave pubs a hell of a lot of trouble when they get aggro, heat would be less as there would be more of a fear factor.
sir ratholer wrote:Personally I feel that if more players took cannonballs stance and gave pubs a hell of a lot of trouble when they get aggro, heat would be less as there would be more of a fear factor.
Could do, but is this a good thing? Might lead to barrings before entry and if the machine is seen as the problem there could be less machines in pubs altogether... I haven't got a general stance but just playing devils advocate here..Maybe a Tip-over is a bit too direct, say they do switchoffs...they could do a few a more subliminal approach where the culprit is not known, such as a brick in a window or phonecalls would be the same but keep a mask on the perpatrator?
if the lanlord is upset when somone gets a jackpot then why have a machine, turning of machines while jackpot is going round or while colecting out is out of order, and action will be made is payment is not recived...
thecannonball89 wrote:if the lanlord is upset when somone gets a jackpot then why have a machine, turning of machines while jackpot is going round or while colecting out is out of order, and action will be made is payment is not recived...
Yeah I agree with taht. It's just what happens to the machine afterwards. If it's a playable and gets switched out, where's it going to go? If you know a circuit of pubs that'll swap amchines about and have a good idea about it, then by all means slash the landlords tyres and shit in his urinals
