My F**king Day

ma71lda · Post by **ma71lda** » Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:22 am

Interesting. Work for the tabloids do we, L24?

liverpool24 · Post by **liverpool24** » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:33 pm

ma71lda wrote:Interesting. Work for the tabloids do we, L24?

No, not lately anyway.

2 down for the melons · Sun Oct 10, 2010 2:06 am

pokerpete wrote:I think it's funny to watch two equally bad spellers correcting each other.

Although i laughed at this comment the other day, i will say, i only corrected once, and that was mainly a bit of tit for tat... I don't think im the world's best speller, but saying a bad speller is a bit below the belt!!

And the way i see it, two equally bad spellers correcting each other!!, no there was one correcting, and one who corrected!!

liverpool24 · Post by **liverpool24** » Sun Oct 10, 2010 8:43 am

2 down for the melons wrote:
pokerpete wrote:I think it's funny to watch two equally bad spellers correcting each other.

Although i laughed at this comment the other day, i will say, i only corrected once, and that was mainly a bit of tit for tat... I don't think im the world's best speller, but saying a bad speller is a bit below the belt!!

And the way i see it, two equally bad spellers correcting each other!!, no there was one correcting, and one who corrected!!

It wasn't your spelling that was the problem, it was your grammar.

pokerpete · Post by **pokerpete** » Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:03 am

2 down for the melons wrote:
pokerpete wrote:I think it's funny to watch two equally bad spellers correcting each other.

Although i laughed at this comment the other day, i will say, i only corrected once, and that was mainly a bit of tit for tat... I don't think im the world's best speller, but saying a bad speller is a bit below the belt!!

And the way i see it, two equally bad spellers correcting each other!!, no there was one correcting, and one who corrected!!

You made several silly spelling mistakes.
I don't normally bother pointing bad spelling out on this forum, given the high number of functioning illiterates posting here, but as I said, if you're going to be making corrections, you better be getting your own stuff right.

streakseims · Post by **streakseims** » Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:15 am

Welcome to

The English Launguage chat.

2 down for the melons · Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:29 pm

liverpool24 wrote:
2 down for the melons wrote:
pokerpete wrote:I think it's funny to watch two equally bad spellers correcting each other.

Although i laughed at this comment the other day, i will say, i only corrected once, and that was mainly a bit of tit for tat... I don't think im the world's best speller, but saying a bad speller is a bit below the belt!!

And the way i see it, two equally bad spellers correcting each other!!, no there was one correcting, and one who corrected!!
It wasn't your spelling that was the problem, it was your grammar.

That's what i thought..i've gone back again over my posts, and i can't find several silly spelling mistakes!!

pokerpete · Post by **pokerpete** » Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:17 am

2 down for the melons wrote:
liverpool24 wrote:
2 down for the melons wrote: Although i laughed at this comment the other day, i will say, i only corrected once, and that was mainly a bit of tit for tat... I don't think im the world's best speller, but saying a bad speller is a bit below the belt!!

And the way i see it, two equally bad spellers correcting each other!!, no there was one correcting, and one who corrected!!
It wasn't your spelling that was the problem, it was your grammar.
That's what i thought..i've gone back again over my posts, and i can't find several silly spelling mistakes!!

i = I
u = you
im = I'm
fuckas = fuckers
ur'e = you're
u'll = you'll
you're = your
iv'e = I've
tho = though

and you trotted out the "I before E" rule which, as harry2 pointed out, is not worth the paper it's written on.

mr lugsy · Post by **mr lugsy** » Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:20 am

i hope that was a deliberate mistake in your last sentence pokerpete

pokerpete · Post by **pokerpete** » Mon Oct 11, 2010 9:53 am

Of course.

But I will correct it

2 down for the melons · Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:05 am

pokerpete wrote:
2 down for the melons wrote:
liverpool24 wrote:

It wasn't your spelling that was the problem, it was your grammar.
That's what i thought..i've gone back again over my posts, and i can't find several silly spelling mistakes!!
i = I
u = you
im = I'm
fuckas = fuckers
ur'e = you're
u'll = you'll
you're = your
iv'e = I've
tho = though

and you trotted out the "I before E" rule which, as harry2 pointed out, is not worth the peper it's written on.

I can't really argue against these points!

ops:

Quite glad, u pointed out a few of them, they have crept in from the use of sms, and i thought i was immune from it!!

ops:

I agree about the I before E rule, is not worth the pepper it's written on! I put it in, mainly in jest!!

2 down for the melons · Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:05 am

double post

liverpool24 · Post by **liverpool24** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:04 am

Let's all just relax, we're not making a western here.

pickareel · Post by **pickareel** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:38 pm

uncle junior

PMK · Post by **PMK** » Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:13 pm

Uncle Pennybags