Page 1 of 3
oar and kings ransom
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 11:02 pm
by cspurs1
finally after several blogs on here ive got to grips with tjhese two they aint as blatant as the old invice/vortex but with a bit of thought and patience they aint bad ........but lets be honest invicible rules the world!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 11:45 pm
by Mattb
How can you not get to grips with OAR? KR needs a bit of work at times, but OAR is probably the easiest red of all to play out.
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:16 am
by Martal~Wombat
These 2 m/c's aint even in the same league?
OAR is far far better than KR
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:03 pm
by Alpine021
OAR is ok but not as good as Jackpot Gems was.
The main problem with Kings Ransom is that it takes so god damn long. I've been on one like an hour to either break even or make like a tenner.
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:20 pm
by Mattb
Nope it ain't as good.....its better. How can you say an old £25 JP Gems is better than a £35 +6% OAR. Blatantly isn't!
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:56 pm
by Scott
Mattb wrote:Nope it ain't as good.....its better. How can you say an old £25 JP Gems is better than a £35 +6% OAR. Blatantly isn't!
totally agree, I can't believe anyone would find jackpot gems better than on a roll.
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:00 pm
by gambogaz1
He maybe comparing £25's as I've never done well on a £25 OAR but have done on JG. However OAR £35's are in a different league.
.
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:32 pm
by milk monitor
The +6% really made these clones, didn't particularily like JJ or HM on 25p/30p
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:43 pm
by cspurs1
obviously im a little late on the red thing..it aint my fault its where i live,but all im saying is i sussed out invincible/vortex real quick where as i found these two take a bit more thought..but saying all that they are better now ,now ive educted myself a bit and have done ok recently on them..the post was really a little thankyou to all that gave me some simple guidance so thanks again........
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 7:36 pm
by MrRed
Yeah OAR much better than JP Gems
JP Gems loves doing staggered streaks
Had plenty big tops from OAR both £25 and £35
I would say that the £25/50p ones were the best
I had some big wins from these
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:53 pm
by YoungKai
Alpine021 wrote:OAR is ok but not as good as Jackpot Gems was.
The main problem with Kings Ransom is that it takes so god damn long. I've been on one like an hour to either break even or make like a tenner.
JG better? behave. jacpot gems was a shit red. loved the cost between tops/hated repeating the top. and as for Ransom, i'll agree with you on the £25, but the £35 is just fine as long as the bonus gamble doesn't play up
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:31 am
by know-your-role
all those 5winline clones were shite end of
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:09 am
by Alpine021
I am on about the £25 JG vs OAR. Don't even think I've played a £35 JG.
But all the £25 JG's I had were amazing.
Only really had 1 or 2 £35 OARs and they were both good n's. Had 2 £140's off one of them.
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 8:54 pm
by Scott
I don't think they did a £35 JG, only OAR, and i don't even think they put the 50p option on JG either, i've certainly never seen it, this is why i prefered OAR, purely because some had the 50p option, and they were much better than the 25p ones IMO.
to be honest i never got one with either of these on 25p, but if you've made money on em Alpine then fair play, maybe i was unlucky
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:39 pm
by 999329753
There was def a 35 JG, we had 2 in Ipswich. The one in the spoons was evil. We have had a few OARs and they seem to play much better.