phÂœnix +86, china calling: "harro"
- Istenem
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5918
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:42 pm
- Location: the nation's capital
- Contact:
phœnix +86, china calling: "harro"
i'm almost sure this has been asked before, but, what do the following descriptions have in common?
comparatively more quaint
archaic/biblical consensus
a worker in copper/zinc alloy
comparatively more quaint
archaic/biblical consensus
a worker in copper/zinc alloy
nobody ever wins on those things.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 1554
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:06 am
- Matt Vinyl
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:56 pm
- Location: Lost in the outback, Bryan
- Istenem
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5918
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:42 pm
- Location: the nation's capital
- Contact:
i'd doubt it. <Istenem gets on his soapbox and yadders on about words for a while> afaik the only triple WS allows is BRRR, but you need to go to an irresponsible american scrabble dictionary to find that.Matt Vinyl wrote:does WU/WS accept TWEEER and AGREEETH? Handy for getting rid of excessive E's (so to speak!)
the old version had LBW as a word but i think that was for uncopyrightable* reasons. don't get me started Matt, i don't have an off button about wordnerdery.
*okay here is a fairly obvious one:
why are AMBIDEXTROUSLY and UNCOPYRIGHTABLE interesting words?
nobody ever wins on those things.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 1:48 pm