purely for repeat return/delusions of profit/ loss-over-the-years, would have to be AWPS? unless of course you're a so called 'AWP pro' (cue controvesy).
I may get screamed at this for suggestion, but solely for the years 2006-2007 Barcrest are getting a mention for me. Loved old barcrests mut the very few machines they have brought out in the last year have been poor in my opinion.
prizeguy wrote:I may get screamed at this for suggestion, but solely for the years 2006-2007 Barcrest are getting a mention for me..
Not at all! I vote Barcrest because they're getting it all wrong at the moment, cloning an abysmal format which has precious little appeal to any right-minded individual. It's gaming without the fun.
This machine may at times offer a choice where the player has every chance of bankruptcy
Barcrest for me too. It's actually at the stage where i would rather play a DOND or games media clone than a new crest. Diabolical - certainly not what i was thinking after their last awesome machine (TAW). :x
"Sixty percent of the time, it works, every time!"
What did you like so much about raise the roof? I have one on 10p/£5 and it has the worst profile ever. Dead for ages...board that offers 3 quid...dead for ages...jackpot (no repeat)...dead for ages....3 quid board...dead for ages....jackpot(no repeat)...dead for ages....you get the picture!
That's what £5 machines can play like in my opinion.
I'm talking about the £25 JP's. Very easily readable. Not mega profit but when you've got 3 in the same town and you could tell off the 1st board wether the JP was gainable within £25 then it was rich pickings. And the top reguarly gave at least £35 or more.
I don't mind Games Media at all to be fair... 