Page 3 of 3
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 10:38 am
by Northern Monkey
Ruler of The World wrote:Guessing you mean El Sal for the last
you've lost me?
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:12 pm
by Ruler of The World
The horse in the last race is called El Sal not El Salvador
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:19 pm
by Northern Monkey
Not in the card in my paper or on racing post site?
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 1:53 pm
by Ruler of The World
Hmmm on the Coral race card it was El Sal!
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 2:48 pm
by Ruler of The World
Final day scores:
After race 1:
Northern Monkey 402
Ruler of the World 364
After race 2:
Northern Monkey 402
Ruler of The World 389
After race 3:
Ruler of The World 424
Northern Monkey 417
(10 points extra for Ruler for consecutive winners rule)
After race 4:
Ruler of The World 549
Northern Monkey 417
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 6:49 pm
by Ruler of The World
Day 5 scores:
Ruler of The World 185
Northern Monkey 45
Final scores:
Ruler of The World 549
Northern Monkey 432
Final scores the old way:
Ruler of The World 151
Northern Monkey 117
(Forgot last night big race winners gave 20)
Winners:
Ruler of The World 8/30, 5 2nd, 2 3rd
Northern Monkey 6/30, 5 2nd 1 3rd
Question is, should there be a stewards into my deliberately not backing the same big race horse as my rival yesterday in an attempt to win when seemingly dead? I think we will let Harry decide!
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 7:27 pm
by Northern Monkey
Entertaining enough ROTW - thanks for having the patience to run the numbers on the various complex scoring methods that I confess I never quite followed. Safe to say neither of us will be retiring on the back of the last 5 days.
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 7:48 pm
by Ruler of The World
Yes but funny that the generic favourite backers would have done better than both of us and it always seems to be the case in the big meetings, maybe favourite backing is in fact the best way to play!?