http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/consult_m ... s_duty.htm
Out this afternoon. Only had about five minutes' look but the proposal appears to be that the proposed new duty (Machine Games Duty) won't distinguish between SWPs and AWPs in the way the current Amusement Machine Licence Duty (AMLD) does. As the paper puts it (at paragraph 3.3), "modern machines often rely on computer technology and differences between games of chance and games of skill are slight and difficult to verify". I don't disagree with that, although it's perhaps a little worrying that SWPs will be brought inside the new duty given they're free from duty at the moment...
New paper from HMRC on taxation of games machines
- Topical2009
- Senior Member
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:39 pm
- Location: Oxford
-
- Member
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:27 pm
swp's do not have a limit on their jackpot.The connected millionaire machines offered jackpot of up to and beyond a grand.The fact that pubs didnt have them was probably due to cost and limitations of space although there was a millionaire with a jackpot of £100 in a pub in Milton Keynes at one time.In fact the trend has been to lower jackpots,or introduce games in at low settings so that it would be a miracle for the theoretical jackpot to ever be reached.
-
- Member
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:27 pm
very true! but old gits like me will always refer to the it as the jackpot- what actually is the difference between the two except spelling? I think the reason that games often do not advertise a jackpot is that its totally unrealistic as most people do well even to win a pound so its creating unrealistic expectations.