Page 1 of 2

IVE COVERED 35 NUMBERS!

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 11:15 pm
by mjd
Only one I haven't covered is 16



SPIN

.........


.............



16......

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Ok I made that up, but its true innit pal!!

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:53 am
by itsme
I've gone a few weeks without touching one of these daft machines now, thats not bad for me. Used to be hooked big style, did some proper candy on these, Left myself fucked week after week,.

But yeah, If you covered 35 number's, the one you leave will drop in..

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 6:53 pm
by prizeguy
yep trying to stop playing these too, reckon done about 10k in the 10 months I have been playing them, which sounds terrible, but probably light compared to some other stories I have heard and seen. No worse feeling than doing your months wages in 20 minutes. Of course a few £1k plus wins in your head forgots those bad days. Just a good job I am not on my fully qualified wages yet, as would have done probably 3 times that. Its strange you look at people playing them and no one seems to enjoy playing them, people look stressed, skaking, sweating on where that number is going to land. Even see some people who cant even look at the screen. Wish I just stayed playing fruities bad day on them yoused to mean I might not be out on the drink tonight, bad day on the roulettes means you are doing nothing that month.

Whats everyones biggest wins/losses in a session

mine biggest win £1300 £200 in
biggest loss about £1500 in less than an hour

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:01 pm
by Scott
A friend told me a story about roulette a while back, he had a £1000 cash in his flat that faces a row of shops with a bookies, he took £10 out with him to get some bacon from the co-op, he decided to just nip in the bookies and try the roulette hoping to win a few quid from the £10 he had on him, he done the £10 so went home to get some more money and ended up doing the full grand :roll: he has signed a self exclusion thingy, but still gets a lift too a different shop. these things ruin lives and are very dangerous.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:34 pm
by Drpepper
They're evil, full stop.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 10:57 pm
by JG
Yes they really can be devastating. I once lost £?00 just messing about trying to ascertain if they were rigged. As they seemed to usually land on the same number on £1 stakes if bet at the 'exact' same time, then land on different numbers (both losing) on nearly all simultaneous £20 bets, i concluded that something was afoot and have played nowt but the odd L8 since. Strangely enough I then put £10 in a Gold Rush, gambled out (aggresively) the nugget things and won £45? was it? is it? Hmmmm wasn't it? The Gold Rush had replaced a p1 Wizzigig(*) (which is why I was in there) back in Marchypoops of last year. I thought I could have squeaked away with £35 profit, not bonged out with a half K mauling. Even back to back £105 tops couldn't have saved me. An accidental total hopper dump wouldn't have saved me.

WHY DIDN'T I LISTEN TO MY FELLOW FRUIT CHATTERS? THEY SAID THEY WERE RIGGED AND THEY WERE RIGGED. RIGGED> RIGGED> This was when William Hill had Itboxes. £600ish in an Itbox, the shame. THE SHAME. How long would it take to lose £600 on Bullseye? A bloopin' long time. I guess if you turned down all wins, it'd be 101 starting......very first go...press here for prize board....press here for Bully's special prize. £5.

These are EVIL, DEVESTATING, DANGEROUS and DASTARDLY and you have to be a DICK to play them.


The police have made me sign an order promising that I will not smash any more FOBTs otherwise I will stay with or near or at the pleasure of someone called Her Majesty apparently.
This is as a result of a small child slipping over a clean surface and cutting themselves ever so slightly on a bit of FOBT screen that was on the floor of a Ladbrokes. My defence is that the child should not have been in the bookmakers, but the prosecution is arguing that I was being negligent, smashing open the terminals for money and disregarding the welfare of others. The child's mother is asking for compensation of £600,000, about the amount I made from the FOBTs with my sledgehammer. So by the time I've paid legal costs, if I lose this case, I'll be in dire need of a couple of emptiers.

So my advice is, don't play these. If you do get the urge then fiddle about with a fake twenty, fishing/prop wire, cards, magnets, blockers, rf jammers, whizzpoppers, slacksliders, jizzspunkers, pulse emitters, drill clockers, strim busters, whizziwhirlers and Wonka Fabmeltulousfobtemptyinggobthumpers. That or just keep kicking it till it gives you credit.


(*) Wizzigig or Wizziwig, slang for WIYB.

Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 5:31 am
by davidpom
Those bookie FOBT machines are horrible. My thoughts on the matter can be found at:

http://beatthecasinos.blogspot.com/2007 ... -fobt.html and http://beatthecasinos.blogspot.com/2007 ... rvice.html

But there is an alternative to playing them (other than just stopping cold turkey, or going to a REAL casino): http://beatthecasinos.blogspot.com/2008 ... lette.html

Hopefully these links will be useful for you - any feedback happily received. :-)

PS: If you're into slots I now have http://beattheslots.blogspot.com up and running too - it's just about slots, nothing else. :-)

Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:46 pm
by JG
I'm sorry. I can't allow that. If you're going to post duplicate postings after my post I'm afraid I'm going to have to physically enforce that this does not ever happen again. I have access to remote ID isp trace codes that will enable me to trace, via a network of inaugral detectives your exact GPS co-ordinates. I will then physically block the action of you typing keys, or at least pressing Ctrl C/Ctrl V, to save the forum from these evil linkages. My posting was exquisitively crafted by masterful stroking of the keyboard. You have just bludgeoned it to death by your evil cut and paste butchery. I shall now be seeking revenge. I shall also repost my original post, so let's just pretend this sorry debarclypoos never happenned.



** REPEAT POSTING AWARDED! **

Yes they really can be devastating. I once lost £?00 just messing about trying to ascertain if they were rigged. As they seemed to usually land on the same number on £1 stakes if bet at the 'exact' same time, then land on different numbers (both losing) on nearly all simultaneous £20 bets, i concluded that something was afoot and have played nowt but the odd L8 since. Strangely enough I then put £10 in a Gold Rush, gambled out (aggresively) the nugget things and won £45? was it? is it? Hmmmm wasn't it? The Gold Rush had replaced a p1 Wizzigig(*) (which is why I was in there) back in Marchypoops of last year. I thought I could have squeaked away with £35 profit, not bonged out with a half K mauling. Even back to back £105 tops couldn't have saved me. An accidental total hopper dump wouldn't have saved me.

WHY DIDN'T I LISTEN TO MY FELLOW FRUIT CHATTERS? THEY SAID THEY WERE RIGGED AND THEY WERE RIGGED. RIGGED> RIGGED> This was when William Hill had Itboxes. £600ish in an Itbox, the shame. THE SHAME. How long would it take to lose £600 on Bullseye? A bloopin' long time. I guess if you turned down all wins, it'd be 101 starting......very first go...press here for prize board....press here for Bully's special prize. £5.

These are EVIL, DEVESTATING, DANGEROUS and DASTARDLY and you have to be a DICK to play them.


The police have made me sign an order promising that I will not smash any more FOBTs otherwise I will stay with or near or at the pleasure of someone called Her Majesty apparently.
This is as a result of a small child slipping over a clean surface and cutting themselves ever so slightly on a bit of FOBT screen that was on the floor of a Ladbrokes. My defence is that the child should not have been in the bookmakers, but the prosecution is arguing that I was being negligent, smashing open the terminals for money and disregarding the welfare of others. The child's mother is asking for compensation of £600,000, about the amount I made from the FOBTs with my sledgehammer. So by the time I've paid legal costs, if I lose this case, I'll be in dire need of a couple of emptiers.

So my advice is, don't play these. If you do get the urge then fiddle about with a fake twenty, fishing/prop wire, cards, magnets, blockers, rf jammers, whizzpoppers, slacksliders, jizzspunkers, pulse emitters, drill clockers, strim busters, whizziwhirlers and Wonka Fabmeltulousfobtemptyinggobthumpers. That or just keep kicking it till it gives you credit.


(*) Wizzigig or Wizziwig, slang for WIYB.

Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 9:56 am
by Status8
I have seen this happen in Ladbrokes Southampton. A fella bet 20p on every number except 11, and 11 came in.

:shock:

Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:09 am
by harry2
Someone I know bet bet on 15 only and it came in too !!

Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:17 am
by JG
Harry's story is proof that these dastardly machines are rigged!

Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 11:00 pm
by anfield road
Have bet loads of times on just 1 number with like £8 etc and lower ammounts had it come in numerous times!!! had it loads of times aswel when I have only had 1 number with nothing on and it spun it and doubled up..... these are rigged

Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 5:44 pm
by TheMagicWanderer
That's cause they are RANDOM, but that means instead of picking a number between 0 and 36, they might pick one between say 0 and 38 and those extra two numbers always make you lose, or pay less than you've bet.... :)

Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:38 pm
by Dave FOBT King
I covered 0 26 32 16 18 19 21 5 & 8 am it came in 46 times in a row

£9 a spin made like £1200

it is a fix because i seen a guy putting in about £600-800 and lose :x before i had a go.

he should have just given me the cash beforehand. :D

Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:31 pm
by bigv038
46 x 36 = 1656