Balance and imbalance - Even chances.
Would you chase for an event or would you let the event come to you?
Would you force the wheel play your game or would you let game play it self for correction?
Would you re-invent the wheel?
Be prepared for a different methodology based upon math, probability and statistics.
Claim that is based upon fallacy, ridiculous!
The law for correction for underrepresented figures and events is true, if the value for the imbalance rise above an statistical ecart of 2,5.
Almost infallible.
Observation and masse égale - takes time - but the reward is incredible.
How to find an imbalance, witch figures and events to calculate, the possibilities is many to get qualified signals:
1:1 Singels contra nothingness
1:2 Singels contra series
1:3 Singels contra series of singels
1:4 Series contra singels
1:5 Series contra higher series
How to calculate and get the value for imbalance, qualified signals.
The Statistical Ecart.
Here below we have 14 series and 2 singels.
Now the first thing is to get the difference between this events, the absolute ecart:
14 - 2 = 12
Now we whant to get the statistical ecart so we add
14 + 2 = 16
Now we take the sqr of 16 = 4
And finally we divide the absolute ecart whit the sqr
12 sqr 4 = 3,00
The Statistical Ecart 3,00
There is one rule:
The imbalance, the qualified signal, has to hit 2,5 or above within 20 to 50 outcomes, not above, because it effects the strength behind the imbalance.
Here is the singels underrepresented so lets take a look at the correction after a value of 3,00
Spielbank Hamburg Tabel No 1 2003-01-02
Series contra singel - Red-Black.
Statistical Ecart 3,00
R
R
R
B
B
R
B
B
B
B
R
R
B
B
B
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B
R
B
B
R
R
R
R
B
B
R
R
B
B..3,00
R..R
B..B +
R..R +
R.....-
R
B
B.....-
R..R
B..B +
R..R +
R.....-
B..B
R..R +
R.....-
B..B
R..R +
B..B +
B -
R..R
B..B +
R..R +
B..B +
R..R +
B..B +
B.....-
R
R
B..B
R..R +
B..B +
B.....-
B
W W L
W W L
W L
W W L
W W W W W L
W W L
Here you have a chart for the statistical ecart.
At the top you have the underrepresented figure, event.
At the left side do you have the overrepresented figure, event.
Here we don´t start to play until we have indications for corrections. That is a difference. To play after some thing have rich 99.9 is ridiculous there is no indication it will show or go for correction, that is exactly what i mean whit chasing an event.
So don't give me that there is no difference, its huge.
3,00 >>>
B
R..R
B..B
R..R serie of 3 RBR
R
R
B
B
R..R
B..B
R..R serie of 3 RBR
R
B..B
R..R serie of 2 BR
R
B..B
R..R
B..B serie of 3 BRB
B
R..R
B..B
R..R
B..B
R..R
B..B serie of 6 RBRBRB
B
R
R
B..B
R..R
B..B serie of 3 BRB
B
B
Now here is another example:
O
O
E
E
O
O
E
E
E
O
O
O
E
E
E
E
O
O
O
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
O
E
E
O
O
E
E
O
O
O
O
O
E
O
O
E
E 3,00
O...O
E...E serie of 2 OE
E
E
E
E
O...O
E...E
O...O serie of 3 OEO
O
E...E
O...O
E...E serie of 3 EOE
E
E
E
E
O...O
E...E
O...O
E...E
O...O
E...E
O...O serie of 7 OEOEOEO
O
O
O
E...E
O...O
E...E serie of 3 EOE
E
E
E
O
E
E
E
E
E
E
O...O
E...E
O...O
E...E
O...O serie of 5 OEOEO
O
E
E
O
E
I will explain the indication and the march but just for fun lets say we would start after 3,00 whit a serie of 2 as an indication for corection then we get this W/L strikes.
W W L W W W
L W W W W W
This would be the result if we bet after a switch as an indication for corection:
R/B - W W L L W W L W L W W L W W W W W L L W W L
E/O - W L W W L W W L W W W W W W L W W L L W W W W L
Well maybe you will get a chock. But you can get the imbalance anywhere so long it occurs within 20 to 50 outcomes. And there is not difficult to track. I hope this helps:
Red-Black
High-Low
You have to have a strong imbalance if its going to work.
The law of correction indicates that the stronger imbalance you get - then less random things occur to be for correction.
Series contra higher series
RED
RED
........ BLACK
........ BLACK
RED
RED
........ BLACK
........ BLACK
RED
........ BLACK
........ BLACK
RED
RED
RED
RED
........ BLACK
........ BLACK
RED
RED
........ BLACK
........ BLACK
RED
........ BLACK
RED
RED
RED
........ BLACK
........ BLACK
RED
........ BLACK
RED
RED
........ BLACK
RED
RED
......... BLACK
RED
........ BLACK
........ BLACK
RED
........ BLACK
RED
........ BLACK
RED
........ BLACK
........ BLACK
RED
RED................STATITICAL ECART 3,00 14 series of 2 and 2 series above
........ BLACK
RED
......... BLACK
......... BLACK
......... BLACK
RED
RED
RED
........ BLACK
........ BLACK WIN
RED
........ BLACK
RED
........ BLACK
RED
........ BLACK
RED
........ BLACK
........ BLACK
........ BLACK
RED
RED
RED
RED
........ BLACK
........ BLACK WIN
Here is one chart level betting for the correction, no progression, only masse égale. Statistical Ecart 3,00.
RNG Series contra singels:
Here is one chart level betting for the correction, no progression, only masse égale. Statistical Ecart 3,00.
RNG Series contra singels:
Here is one chart level betting for the correction, no progression, only masse égale. Statistical Ecart 3,00.
RNG Singels contra series:
Now it all depends on how you catch the correction after a indication that is starts to recoup for balance.
Now if we just play whit 3 units and stop if we lose this 3 units and stop after we have 1 unit in profit, then the result of 96 qualified signals will give us this result.
Travemunde tabel 1 920101-930630
96 qualified signals 81 won 15 loss.
That's give us a Estat of 7.21
G = total gain in units
b = number of placed bets
I think this is how you calculate the Estat:
lose 45 units won 81 units that's 126 placed bets sqr 11,22
divide whit 81 is 7,21
Now we can use masse égale in many different ways.
Lets say that we wont more out of the correction after its indicates that its starts to recoup for balance.
We should do something like this.
Lets say that we are level betting whit 5 greens for 3 steps.
Itch time we place a bet of this 3 - 5 5 5 - we put 20 euro on zero. So if Zero hits we start over.
Now after we win once we level betting whit 2 greens - that's 4 -
level betting twice 2 2 - if we lose we have 1 unit profit - if we win we have 7 units in profit. Then we can play twice whit 1 1.
But we only safe guard whit a % on zero for the 3 first steps.
So the conclusion is you don´t profit from the first 3 steps.
The degression of 22 11 is the key to build your bankroll into profit.
---
Now the Estat isn't correct i was just calculated the wins and loss but the placed bets is offcourse more sense the all of the wins of 1 unit didn't came at the very first attempt, sorry for that.
The Estat is lower then 7.21
---
ITS A % GAME ITS A GAME OF DISTRIBUTION
---
RED - BLACK
Spielbank Hamburg
2000 01 01 Tabel 1
1 QS Serier contra singel + 1 UNIT WAGERING 1
---
2000 01 02 Tabel 1
1 QS Series contra singel + 1 UNIT WAGERING 1
---
2000 01 03 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 04 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 05 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 06 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singels
---
2000 01 07 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singels
---
2000 01 08 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singels
---
2000 01 09 Tabel 1
1 QS Series contra singels + 1 UNIT WAGERIN 1
---
2000 01 10 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 11 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 12 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 13 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 14 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 15 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 16 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 17 Tabel 1
1 QS Series contra singel + 1 UNIT WAGERING 2
---
2000 01 18 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 19 Tabel 1
1 QS Series contra singel + 1 UNIT WAGERING 1
---
2000 01 20 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 21 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 22 Tabel 1
1 QS Series contra singel + 1 UNIT WAGERING 1
---
2000 01 23 Tabel 1
1 QS Series contra singel + 1 UNIT WAGERING 1
---
2000 01 24 Tabel 1
1 QS Series contra singel + 1 UNIT WAGERING 1
---
2000 01 25 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 26 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 27 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 28 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 29 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 30 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 01 31
1 QS .Series contra singel
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
2000 02 01 Tabel 1
1 QS .Series contra singel
---
2000 02 02 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 03 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 04 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 05 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 06 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 07 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 08 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 09 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 10 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 11 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 12 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 13 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 14 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 15 Tabel 1
1 QS Series contra singel + 1 UNIT WAGERING 1
---
2000 02 16 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 17 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 18 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 19 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 20 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 21 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 22 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 23 Tabel 1
0 QS Series contra singel
---
2000 02 24 Tabel 1
2 QS Series contra singel + 2 UNITS WAGERING 2
---
