Online Roulette Program

psyman · Post by **psyman** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:49 pm

Remember folks you can try if for free for a couple of days without paying £9 - I made it like that so people can see for themselves it actually works before having to send any money.

And no - this system wont work on real roulette tables - they really are random :-)

Nero · Post by **Nero** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:57 pm

I have in the past turned £20 into £500 on Roulette a couple of times, and that didn't involve giving some scammer some of it to tell me where to bet.

Trust me, this software is a WASTE of money, 100%, no doubts about it. You'll probably find it'll give you "results" at first, as is perfectly likely with any Roulette "systems". And then it'll turn against you and in the long-term, you'll lose money.

Just as I did when after turning £20 into £500 a couple of times, I managed to turn £500 into nothing on even more occasions.

If you don't believe me then do yourself a favour and do some research on Roulette betting systems before parting with any money, even if it is only £9.

Nero · Post by **Nero** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:59 pm

And no - this system wont work on real roulette tables - they really are random

lol. I agree your system would work if you could actually find me an online Roulette table that wasn't random. But that's an entirely different story.

You are clearly under the misguided illusion that computers still can't draw true random numbers. Wrong.

bigv038 · Post by **bigv038** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:28 pm

spot on Nero

theoak · Post by **theoak** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:32 pm

Computers in their very nature STILL can't provide 'truely random numbers' but I doubt any computer system that analizes the results you have so far (rather than being 'plugged into' the RNG itself) will give you any reliable results.

the only question is whether these computerised tables ARE 'random', anyone? :P

Nero · Post by **Nero** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:39 pm

Computers alone are unable to draw perfect random numbers because they basically have to be told what to do, but the workaround for this is to draw randomness from something physical which is attached to the machine.

That's how you do get true random numbers, and that's how truly random cards are drawn at poker rooms whose RNGs are tested by PwC and the like, and that's how truly random numbers are generated for use on an online Roulette table. Ergo, this "system" offered here is flawed and 100% useless.

psyman · Post by **psyman** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:12 pm

Tell that to the people who have all had results so far - if you are skeptical try it yourself on practice mode before passing comment - if you try & it doesnt work then fine - slag it off all you want. But to dismiss it without giving it a try - thats hardly fair.

Nero · Post by **Nero** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 6:10 pm

Sorry mate but whether you know what you're doing or not, you're the one being unfair by trying to charge for something that isn't anywhere near fit for purpose.

psyman · Post by **psyman** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:26 am

have you tried it?

did you read the 3 day free trial part?

no and no eh?

Jeez dude you are so closed minded.

bigv038 · Post by **bigv038** » Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:37 am

im gonna put all the online casinos outta business with this

NOT!

orinoko · Post by **orinoko** » Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:12 pm

theoak wrote:Computers in their very nature STILL can't provide 'truely random numbers' but I doubt any computer system that analizes the results you have so far (rather than being 'plugged into' the RNG itself) will give you any reliable results.

the only question is whether these computerised tables ARE 'random', anyone? :P

Of corse they are not random! During a 20 minute stint at the local bookies I had the numbers 9 and 24 come up 3 times in a row (and lost 60 quid) - see that in a casino?

theoak · Post by **theoak** » Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:19 pm

That 'll happen one in every 1369 times. so to happen twice in a small sample IS pretty unlikely...

theoak · Post by **theoak** » Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:27 pm

Haha, just downloaded this and gave it a try, basically it only tellls you where to bet if x amount of the opposite happens, eg; you get 10 blacks in a row, it says 'bet red' 10 high numbers; bet low! then as soon as it comes up it goes silent. what a crock of shit.

psyman · Post by **psyman** » Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:10 pm

[quote="theoak"]Haha, just downloaded this and gave it a try, basically it only tellls you where to bet if x amount of the opposite happens, eg]

Well dude that shows that you havent actually tried it and in fact its you who is full of shit.

why? Because it NEVER asks you to bet on black or red or high/low numbers. So either you have misunderstood how to use it or you are lying.

Matt Vinyl · Post by **Matt Vinyl** » Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:37 pm

I'm all for someone trying to better our chances at winning (for the record: I never have and never will play any sort of roulette) but, is this software not just a replication of someones playing method, if they had common sense?

Again, as my experience of these is limited (read: zilcho) I have no factual evidence to support my theories. But, surely these 'must' be random, as in the previous result has absolutely no effect on the subsequent result?

Take flipping a coin: out of 100 flips, you'd expect roughly 50:50 ratio of heads to tails. (Not taking into account strange occurences like the coin landing on it's edge, etc). But, if you had thrown 50 consecutive 'head' results, what would you bet on next? Experience would say heads, the law of averages would suggest tails. Of course, this is all thrown out the window because it's not a 'fixed' environment. How does the coin 'know' you are only going to throw it 100 times, so it should provide roughly 50/50 results?

A lot of conjecture and un-clear explaining by me there, but I'm sure you get the gist...