Page 1 of 2
Road 2 Riches
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:44 pm
by HorseRacingKing
playing this in a pub and hit super streak of about £3 for the board I took it and went £8.
Should I have gone for jackpot?
Most times you get jackpot you've put 30 in for 35 and your £5 up why not just take £5 of a board
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:00 pm
by anfield road
Well nobody would take pot if they are that high up with one gamble left and there aint a block from pot to top anyway!
There is 3 feature on the top 2 are JP and one is RTR! use your brain!
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:03 pm
by HorseRacingKing
anfield road wrote:Well nobody would take pot if they are that high up with one gamble left and there aint a block from pot to top anyway!
There is 3 feature on the top 2 are JP and one is RTR! use your brain!
If you used your scouse head and realised i took super streak
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:22 pm
by anfield road
Yeahif you look you said MOST TIMES you put £30 in for £35 so obviously you have being in this situation more than once!!!!!
and if you are that high then why not force out RTR
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 9:28 pm
by bowie
If it's offering SS it's not too far away.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:33 pm
by silent g
bowie wrote:If it's offering SS it's not too far away.
i find it only offers ss when near and i only force if cash is up to £8 and £10 coz i find theres a block around £5.
dont hold out for a top tho as i find it likes to do a flat 35 then die.
i played one put a 5er in cashpot was £35 was on £35 cash lower than a 10 killed me then cost £20 to get r2r and gave £35 then died.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:42 pm
by PMK
I use to quite like these but nowadays they just do my head in, the boards are so annoying and the blocks are ridiculous, the MS rarely goes over £35 and I cant remember the last time I see one go over £50 like the good old days!! Even when offering SS they can take an age, I use to play on 30p for lines and try and rip an IM but that doesn't seem to happen either. Totally awful machine.
As anfield says there are a couple of features at top level that are pots/MS but they seem more difficult to get then when these were first around. MMM is far better and the MS(red) is far more generous.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:47 pm
by bowie
The general consensus seems to be, passsed a fiver and offering SS, play for the IM from lines.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:42 pm
by toothless11
During force, if its flying then you should be able to get an early JP off Number Cruncher anyways. You occasionally get the IM in which you will smash it for like 70-120.
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 10:17 pm
by bowie
Very rarely offers anything of the top row, and when it does the top is so close anyway.
Is Rattle and Roll wedgeable?
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:01 am
by Matt Vinyl
you should be able to get an early JP off Number Cruncher anyways
Sadly, twice I've taken this, and even though pot has been within 2 steps, it's fobbed me off with <£2!!!
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:10 am
by GaryChandler
Matt Vinyl wrote:you should be able to get an early JP off Number Cruncher anyways
Sadly, twice I've taken this, and even though pot has been within 2 steps, it's fobbed me off with <£2!!!
Well cant say i have ever had that!
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:36 am
by Matt Vinyl
I know! It's usually a cert on Carribean Cash, and if the setup is right on Panthers etc (quick rip of course, if ITP is blocked).
Thankfully, both of those times, it has relented within the next £10 and gone up for MS.
Still a bugger though...

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:40 pm
by nigeswindon25
with out sounding stupid would any one be kind enough to explain the number cruncher feature?
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:45 pm
by Matt Vinyl
Certainly! It's simply a reel step feature, whereby wins and numbers (on super) increase your position up the cash trail.
On super, you can hold individual reels to ensure bigger wins (JP is 'usually' near, but, well, see my post above for what happened to me!) Don't forget that diagonals and top / bottom reels also count on 50p play.
I have had MS off of this before on this, but that was once before I took the above two goes!
