Page 1 of 2
36quid burger ! :O
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:52 am
by GlowingLikeAchristmastree
Me and a smurf boy, who is member here also, was out in stoke area today, about 10.30 decide to go back to car get heading home, anyways pass chippy there is a cliffhanger in there 25jp so we thought we grab a burger and have a go.. for old times sake.. took 45quid to gamble past 5quid! loll but on the chit % in them places was to be expected aww well was fun... blast from the past ( how the hell make money on them 25p jackpots! ) lot easier now.
so 2 burgers cost 36quid

( and they tasted like chit ) lol
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:19 am
by ob
lol alot easier now?!?!?!? not a chance.
Re: 36quid berger ! :O
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:56 am
by TheMission
GlowingLikeAchristmastree wrote:so 2 bergers cost 36quid

( and they tasted like chit ) lol
We're only eleven days in. You still get my nomination for the 'Stupid Spelling of Simple Words' awards 2008.
Re: 36quid berger ! :O
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:01 am
by darren
Yum, ice berger
I assume you didnt play the method if you lost £36, i have IOU'd on occasion via the good old bonus nudges

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:36 am
by nw6
A Patrik berger
Re: 36quid berger ! :O
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:30 am
by pokerpete
TheMission wrote:GlowingLikeAchristmastree wrote:so 2 bergers cost 36quid

( and they tasted like chit ) lol
We're only eleven days in. You still get my nomination for the 'Stupid Spelling of Simple Words' awards 2008.
Tough catagory, but he's definitely in with a shout.
Re: 36quid berger ! :O
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:17 am
by gambogaz1
GlowingLikeAchristmastree wrote:Me and a smurf boy, who is member here also, was out in stoke area today, about 10.30 decide to go back to car get heading home, anyways pass chippy there is a cliffhanger in there 25jp so we thought we grab a berger and have a go.. for old times sake.. took 45quid to gamble past 5quid! loll but on the chit % in them places was to be expected aww well was fun... blast from the past ( how the hell make money on them 25p jackpots! ) lot easier now.
so 2 bergers cost 36quid

( and they tasted like chit ) lol
Went castle then did you ? That cliffhangers been in there for about 2 years. How did you get on ? not much good in the town centre at the moment.
Re: 36quid berger ! :O
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:08 pm
by bigv038
GlowingLikeAchristmastree wrote:took 45quid to gamble past 5quid!
errr did you not think that it wasn't ready

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:22 pm
by barneybear
A gerhard berger?
The British education system NEEDS WORK!
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 2:05 pm
by pokerpete
How can you blame the system?
My 7 year old has better spelling and grammer than that.
Some people are just lazy. Infact, without wishing to cause offence, I would think there is likely to be a higher than average number of lazy people frequenting a gambling forum.

Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 3:28 pm
by betchrider
not always guarenteed to get bonus nudges by the way
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:54 pm
by GlowingLikeAchristmastree
first of all, as stated previously i don't care for my grammar on here!!
Also, it was pretty chit, went into the weatherspoons got 105 out of the jailbirds, 35.. followed by jackpot repeat, the showmethemummy was crap, was one of them should i should i not... lost 20quid.. and also cliffhanger i knew was not due as i said.. was a blast from the past !! and no it didn't offer me bonus nudges

( u was emptying a lot of them with bonus nudges? lol ) because in the whole time i played em and prob did over 500 realisticly i only had it once ! ) LOL
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:05 pm
by betchrider
i only did about 3 i think and 1 of those was a reela win
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:03 am
by jeffvickers
pokerpete wrote:How can you blame the system?
My 7 year old has better spelling and gramm
er than that.
Some people are just lazy.
Infact, without wishing to cause offence, I would think there is likely to be a higher than average number of lazy people frequenting a gambling forum.

Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:28 pm
by TheMission
GlowingLikeAchristmastree wrote:first of all, as stated previously i don't care for my grammar on here!!
Why has it since been edited then?
