Massive Pots

[Ruler of The World]

Is this a play on 50p job...
Rainbow Riches POG gold £500, silver £368, bronze £113?

[streakseims]

no

I've seen £500g
£500s
£260 b

Often you get £500g £300s and £200 b
I know what your thinking...did I see 6 pots go by on reels 2-3-4 or 5? Well to tell you the truth after all this excitement I kinda lost track myself but being as this is rainbow riches the most addictive B3 in the world that can wipe your float clean out....... you gotta ask your self one question....

Do I feel lucky?

[ob]

I've seen 500 400 150. It's gone over 10k cycled without pots then. Imagine you take it on at the point from the last pot say gold might have still been 500 as it sits for weeks so would have been on like 500 300 50. Still good enough but you'd be raped!

When the pots are high I'd suggest it's just harder to get them. Ie you're random chance to get them is lower. Thus the machine is always paying the same percentage.

Why assume games are feeding money into pots from the stake, even alot of high tech games ie reflex etc don't! There is no reason they have too!

Also I doubt playing on 50p will get you pots statistically any cheaper than other stakes. Although you get more spins the spins will have a much lower chance of landing pots.

I once played a winderella yonks ago pots got upto 500/500/500/2xx. Had got 2 off the static 500 ones but got that from 500/500/160/30. Lost like 1500 on it and it was a game that actually gave pots alot comparatively to other b3s. There was no way playing it at 500/500/500/2xx you had the same chance of pots as one on 500/120/70/26 which is more like the pots they are normally on!

[BFK]

So ur saying getting a bronze pot on £63 is more likely than a bronze pot on £93?

Pretty clever how these random games can adjust themselves depending on pot level?

Doesn't sound very random to me given the pot level changes every spin.

The win plan must reduce chances of pots the bigger they get then?

[ob]

Nothing to stop the win plan being adaptive to pot levels. All that needs to change is the chance of pots! If they are double the reset level as a crude example you get half the chance.

Still random and the same percentage payout.

I'm not saying this is definitely how they do it, just a theory!

[Ruler of The World]

It played like shit so i left it for some mug to chase.

[7-10-2-7-LOSE]

I found one of these on £500 Gold, £499.xx Silver and £60 odd bronze so i sat down to have a go.

I got the pots when the Gold was at £500, silver was at £500 and bronze was at £99.xx, it gave me bronze.

I stayed on it. It gave pots again when the bronze was in the £57 region, it gave Gold.

There was a profit of around £200 which for the monies staked in this story is quite incredible.

[e4ans]

[quote="Ruler of The World"]Is this a play on 50p job...
Rainbow Riches POG gold £500, silver £368, bronze £113?[/QUOTE

The 250 pots on compensated RR as you could gamble them out. 50 n 100 n 250 static gold. Was good back in the day

[uber-pro]

Why not feed into the pots? Lot simpler, easier to code, fairer for punter. Of course they don't have to, but wonder if these were effected by the unintended effect of law on cashpots a couple years back.

[ob]

Yeh of course they could it's just based on observations off a lot of machines on high pots that I've made my theory! Of course they don't all have to be the same some could and some might not!

[spa]

They all appear to give more often when they are smaller. Sub £300 golds and so on and horrible close together bronzes, the second for sub £60s.

[ob]

Pure pots gives pots for fun when they are all rubbish!

[Roll_With_It_Russ]

The above suggests that pots are not paid for and are weighted according to value.

[ob]

Yes precisely!