Page 1 of 1

Fobt's in bookies

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:58 pm
by The landlord
Some basic q's on these, are these machines all connected in pay out or If a certain machine has took in a few thousand, is that machine more likely to pay than the 1 next to it that's took in 500? And sorta on same thread if £1000 is put in roulette, does that money stay locked to roulette or does it spread over to other games ie black jack etc in the machines? Cheers folks :)

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:34 pm
by quizard
The roulette and BJ are supposed to be completely random like the real thing. Previous wins/losses have no influence on the next outcome. The same is supposed to be true of cat B2 reel games unless clearly stated otherwise. The Gamblining Commision technical standards for B2 are here http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pd ... on%202.pdf

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:00 pm
by oldskool
quizard wrote:The roulette and BJ are supposed to be completely random like the real thing. Previous wins/losses have no influence on the next outcome. The same is supposed to be true of cat B2 reel games unless clearly stated otherwise. The Gamblining Commision technical standards for B2 are here http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pd ... on%202.pdf

however, we know that is bullshit. i pumped thousands in those cunts and only ever got a bog win out of bookies that took plenty of cash. always lost in the small bookies that never took much over the till/through the machine

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2012 8:18 pm
by Roll_With_It_Russ
more play, more chance of big wins, makes sense

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:14 am
by dakky
if it says random it is

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 12:40 pm
by Ruler of The World
they are far too careful and keep everything too basic to give us an empty. Closest they came to it was Ladbrokes putting Hammer Horror 250 on in selected shops. That lasted a week and hardly anyone was doing it! Far too cautious and clued up, always analysing data the cunts!

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:34 pm
by Roll_With_It_Russ
hammer horror was on a lot longer than a week

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 2:39 pm
by Ruler of The World
2nd time around it was dead on the 250 version £1 stake, barely alive on 50p. You obviously weren't doing these...

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:22 pm
by san186
what was the trick?

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:29 pm
by Scott
Get an axe and hit it as hard as you can!

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:37 pm
by maverick69
snakez and laderz lol..... I had to go around a few bookies today to collect my winnings from the ryder cup bets i put on . anway when i was waiting for the timer on the safe, i was watched a bloke put 100 quid on 2 hands of blackjack 50 on each. so he gets 20 on both hands ,,,,,,dealer has a 2 ....9 .....10 ....21 booom . so rigged its sick...i could tell it was coming aswell

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:41 pm
by Cf
Nothing particularly unusual about that. Dealers get 21 in all sorts of silly scenarios in casinos too. 2 isn't a bad card for the dealer either.

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:57 pm
by maverick69
sorry i forgot to say he went on to loose the next 10 hands also and another 500 quid.there like hoovers mate. i know there rigged asked BFK. they dont feel right the way the computer always wins like 90 per cent of the time. In casinos ive gone in streaks where ive won 12 hands in a row ...ive never ever seen that on a FOBT..lucky to get 2 in a row .never seen 3 me sen. I was thick for playing them when i did for about 2 months...soon learnt my lesson tho

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:17 pm
by maverick69

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 6:22 pm
by Roll_With_It_Russ
I've had 20 in for every hand a win or a push upto 250 on fobt blackjack, its certainly streaky, but you would expect that being a continous deck, 2 is the best card for the dealer apart from Ace when showing anyhand.