£500 Bookies slots

General fruit machine related chat, if it doesn't fit another category discuss it here..
Locked
anonamouse
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: kent

Post by anonamouse »

searching for "the global draw profits" i came across this...

"Hi,

This is my first post here. I found this topic when looking at information for the FOBTs. I work in a bookies. It's one of the bigger ones. Our shop is in direct competition with a much busier shop about 20 yards away. Although I can't post the exact numbers (through fear of being found out), I can post the percentages of how much we paid out compared to how much we took.
These are since April this year and are to the penny.
I don't know if they'll help you but I hate the FOBTs and wish they would be banned from every shop in the country. They ruin people's lives and attract (mostly) unwanted customers.
Again, these are the percentages of money paid out compared to how much we took (from cash and card).

1) 85.7% | 2) 97.2% | 3) 94.4% | 4) 78.8% | 5) 79.4%
6) 56.6% | 7) 81.1% | 8) 80.5% | 9) 88.0% | 10) 84.7%
11) 76.0% | 12) 59.7% | 13) 73.9% | 14) 100.9% | 15) 93%
16) 89.4% | 17) 79.6% | 1 8) 37.6% | 19) 78.0% | 20) 73.1%

Week 20 is the Sunday just gone. As you can see there is only one week this year where we made a loss (Week 14). Some weeks it looks as though we've robbed them blind without even a fair crack of the whip, but bare in mind that some customers put a *lot* of money in to the machines and keep playing until they're potless. I think this is a major factor. We have several regular customers that don't know when to walk away.
Take, for example, one customer that comes in almost daily. Just the last week he put in £20. He managed to get it to £200, hovered around that mark for around 10-15 minutes and then lost it all. He then continued to plough money in chasing it. He complained to me that the machines were fixed (like it would ever stop him from playing them anyway). Because he was a regular and I know how I can talk to him, I was quite blunt in explaining that he managed to get his winnings to 10 times what he put in and that it's up to him to learn when to walk away.
As much as I hate the machines, I also hate the customers that blame everything but their inability to realise that we are a gambling establishment, not a cash machine.

On a side note, the biggest win I have seen someone take in a few years working in several shops is £5500. I don't know how much he put in, but I have heard through the grapevine that it was around £2500."

not rigged?


another one;


"They can't possibly forecast what percentage of cash input is retained by the machines, it depends on playing style - cf previous comments about guaranteeing a 0% retention by buying in and cashing out immediately.

It would be commercially unreasonable to expect the machines to display historical stats, too. Perhaps the GC will one day publish the hold percentage (win as a percentage of cash drop) for FOBTs in bookies, it would be interesting but wouldn't prove anything.

For casinos, the national number - retention about 16% - is on the Gambling Commission website, on one of the statistical digests.

I would expect the FOBT number to be massively higher, although interestingly the number for casino roulette machines - effectively the same game, whatever you might think - is actually lower, I think around 13-14%.

---------------------

I still come back to the question that if you do understand what the 2.7% represents, there cannot be any good reason to "fix" the machines in any way to improve the take. If you don't believe the 2.7% then you're just plain wrong, way too much at stake for operators, machine suppliers and everyone else involved to lie about easily collated statistics."
Roll_With_It_Russ
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:51 pm

Post by Roll_With_It_Russ »

anonamouse wrote:corals gala bingo B3's, £1 stake 90%, £2 stake 92%... got to pay the interest somehow, grrrr!
thats just extracting more in the short term, far better to up the % and get it all anyway.
Roll_With_It_Russ
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:51 pm

Post by Roll_With_It_Russ »

anonamouse wrote:searching for "the global draw profits" i came across this...

"Hi,

This is my first post here. I found this topic when looking at information for the FOBTs. I work in a bookies. It's one of the bigger ones. Our shop is in direct competition with a much busier shop about 20 yards away. Although I can't post the exact numbers (through fear of being found out), I can post the percentages of how much we paid out compared to how much we took.
These are since April this year and are to the penny.
I don't know if they'll help you but I hate the FOBTs and wish they would be banned from every shop in the country. They ruin people's lives and attract (mostly) unwanted customers.
Again, these are the percentages of money paid out compared to how much we took (from cash and card).

1) 85.7% | 2) 97.2% | 3) 94.4% | 4) 78.8% | 5) 79.4%
6) 56.6% | 7) 81.1% | 8) 80.5% | 9) 88.0% | 10) 84.7%
11) 76.0% | 12) 59.7% | 13) 73.9% | 14) 100.9% | 15) 93%
16) 89.4% | 17) 79.6% | 1 8) 37.6% | 19) 78.0% | 20) 73.1%

Week 20 is the Sunday just gone. As you can see there is only one week this year where we made a loss (Week 14). Some weeks it looks as though we've robbed them blind without even a fair crack of the whip, but bare in mind that some customers put a *lot* of money in to the machines and keep playing until they're potless. I think this is a major factor. We have several regular customers that don't know when to walk away.
Take, for example, one customer that comes in almost daily. Just the last week he put in £20. He managed to get it to £200, hovered around that mark for around 10-15 minutes and then lost it all. He then continued to plough money in chasing it. He complained to me that the machines were fixed (like it would ever stop him from playing them anyway). Because he was a regular and I know how I can talk to him, I was quite blunt in explaining that he managed to get his winnings to 10 times what he put in and that it's up to him to learn when to walk away.
As much as I hate the machines, I also hate the customers that blame everything but their inability to realise that we are a gambling establishment, not a cash machine.

On a side note, the biggest win I have seen someone take in a few years working in several shops is £5500. I don't know how much he put in, but I have heard through the grapevine that it was around £2500."

not rigged?
I had some figures pre stakes and prizes cap... paper copy, might still be about somewhere, but figures came from each individual machine, there was no manangement unit. as expected the over 100% was more common, but it was all won in the end.

Just remembered those figures where pre slots... only games allowed was, roulette, crisscross pool, hi lo, jokers wild and £10k multibingo
User avatar
Ruler of The World
Senior Member
Posts: 2110
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:51 pm

Post by Ruler of The World »

Ahem, completely mis-read the posts and went off on 1 LOL

I'll shut up for the night!
Roll_With_It_Russ
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:51 pm

Post by Roll_With_It_Russ »

The problem is many of your points are just a pure guess at how you think it works rather than using any tools or information you have to find out why it is the way it is.
anonamouse
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: kent

Post by anonamouse »

been reading some of the Gambling Commission reports, and to be fair, it is plain for all to see that they know absolutely fuck all about machines. anyway, finding out how much we can expect to win leads me to these quotes;

"(2) Random machines rely purely on statistical probabilities to achieve their target percentage return to player. The odds of achieving a win remain constant, and are not affected by previous wins or losses.

Gaming machines must make information available about their category; % RTP; and whether they are compensated or random."


"Category B1, B2, and B3 gaming machines must be tested and approved by independent test houses to ensure they comply with the technical standards in full."

approved TEST HOUSES: http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pd ... 202012.pdf



to cut a long story short, there is a single sentence that can fuck the entire industry if anybody has the inclination to go to court;

"A machine or device must not present a losing game result which indicates a ‘Near Miss’, e.g.
where the odds of the top award symbol landing on the pay line are limited it must not frequently
appear above or below the pay line. "


read that again;

"A machine or device must not present a losing game result which indicates a ‘Near Miss’, e.g.
where the odds of the top award symbol landing on the pay line are limited it must not frequently
appear above or below the pay line. "


http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pd ... on%202.pdf

section 5.2

the banks have been made to pay out untold millions... i want at least £100,000 back.
Roll_With_It_Russ
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:51 pm

Post by Roll_With_It_Russ »

when did you experience a "near miss", what was the game? what was the wager?

near misses are fine so long as its true to the odds displayed....

for instance, if you bet black on roulette, you either win because it was black, otherwise any loss will be a next door loser... that is true to the representation of the game.
Roll_With_It_Russ
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:51 pm

Post by Roll_With_It_Russ »

When you are talking about slot games, the near misses have to happen in proportion to the time you do win... for instance you get pot symbols on reels 2 and 3, but not on 4... it would be expected that it can near miss twice as often as hit.

Though there is not a requirement for B3 games to have true representation for the odds anyway.

When you get pots on Rainbow riches the pot symbol appears on real 4, every 3rd symbol so its impossible to miss.
anonamouse
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: kent

Post by anonamouse »

a near miss is £13.80 on 35 and you have 100 spins, 10 of which are on 12, 10 of which are on 3.

a near miss is £1000 in Rainbow Riches with 2 leps 50 times, 2 wishing wells 50 times, 2 rainbows 50 times , 4 reels full of RR but no win; a near miss is a near miss that keeps you pumping more money in.


"Percentage return to player equals the value of total wins awarded divided by total value of
play shown as a percentage"
anonamouse
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: kent

Post by anonamouse »

i decided to email the Gambling Commission with the shit i posted previously regarding payout percentages, let's see if anybody bothers to read it...


my suggestion was to have a weekly audit of FOBT payout percentages and to have it prominently displayed in every shop...

Fuck All chance of that ever happening!!!
Roll_With_It_Russ
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:51 pm

Post by Roll_With_It_Russ »

anonamouse wrote:a near miss is £13.80 on 35 and you have 100 spins, 10 of which are on 12, 10 of which are on 3.

a near miss is £1000 in Rainbow Riches with 2 leps 50 times, 2 wishing wells 50 times, 2 rainbows 50 times , 4 reels full of RR but no win; a near miss is a near miss that keeps you pumping more money in.


"Percentage return to player equals the value of total wins awarded divided by total value of
play shown as a percentage"
well on roulette a next door neighbour to a number is twice as likely as hitting the number its self, but its not 20 out of 100

they display the payout of the game on the machine itself, a weekly shop audit would not give a fair representation on the odds of the game.

with games like blackjack optimum stratagy to get the best payoff, if I bust every hand possible the percentage return wil be lower.

same with roulette and no win bets, surprising the amount punters you see betting black and red, or chips on every number, simply giving money to the house
anonamouse
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:45 pm
Location: kent

Post by anonamouse »

when i won £5000 on an FOBT, they had to go to the bank to get the cash. i asked them to put a machine on freeplay while i waited... i played blackjack.. never play it, never played it since...

it plays with a digital 6 packs of cards...

it beat my hand with SEVEN CARDS twice. 7 cards to get blackjack? twice? i'm no statistical genius, but the chances of that happening are a little bit less than sweet FA.
Roll_With_It_Russ
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:51 pm

Post by Roll_With_It_Russ »

anonamouse wrote:when i won £5000 on an FOBT, they had to go to the bank to get the cash. i asked them to put a machine on freeplay while i waited... i played blackjack.. never play it, never played it since...

it plays with a digital 6 packs of cards...

it beat my hand with SEVEN CARDS twice. 7 cards to get blackjack? twice? i'm no statistical genius, but the chances of that happening are a little bit less than sweet FA.
a constantly shuffled deck has no memory, the odds are slightly better than a fixed shuffle, but the odds can never get any better like in pre shuffled shoe.

this leads to games being more streaky in the way they play, win or lose.

low cards are good for the dealer as can redraw many times, compared to just once with 7 or more if a ten is drawn.

a player is only expected to win 4/10 hands at blackjack, the extra odds are made up by BJ,splits and doubles, play the hands wrong and you can get long winning and losing runs.
User avatar
Ruler of The World
Senior Member
Posts: 2110
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 12:51 pm

Post by Ruler of The World »

anonamouse wrote:when i won £5000 on an FOBT, they had to go to the bank to get the cash. i asked them to put a machine on freeplay while i waited... i played blackjack.. never play it, never played it since...

it plays with a digital 6 packs of cards...

it beat my hand with SEVEN CARDS twice. 7 cards to get blackjack? twice? i'm no statistical genius, but the chances of that happening are a little bit less than sweet FA.
Hate to tell you this, but you can only get BLACKJACK from 2 cards! But I guess you mean 21. I don't trust those fucking things which makes me feel even more stupid since I 'don't trust' blackjack yet I'd plough all my money into roulette! Why would roulette be any more trustworthy than blackjack on the same terminals???

Of course on the other side of the counter they'd say "it does happen, its random!"
Roll_With_It_Russ
Senior Member
Posts: 783
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:51 pm

Post by Roll_With_It_Russ »

if you don't count and play infrequent and not a whole shoe till the cut card then you will do better playing the blackjack on the fobt... you can never be in a situation where the deck is negative count(more favourable towards the house).

in a casino you could walk on to a table mid shoe where the chance of winning is less, equally you could walk on when it more favorable towards the player.

some fobt black jack version have hit soft 17, others stand any 17... part from that the rules are very favorable.

Other rules to bear in mind is total stakes can not exceed £100, so any bet higher than £10 on a couple of boxes, which then results in splits and doubles say for instance on 3 boxes, you could be in a posistion where you can't play optimum and therefore already giving away more to the house.

say you play just one box £50, dealt 77, dealer 6, so you split, now you get 73 and 74, you have hit the stake limit, but the rules of the game say you need to double down on both split hands to get the best return... so instead of £200 staked in this favourable position you end up with just £100.

this is why they have the game on there because your always giving away value at any thing but fairly low wagers.
Locked