On the flip side it means Bobby dazzler should of been changed too!
Also next door bully's prize board has changed for an Invincible.
Don't know what JP's they are i shall be investigating later.
Whats on everyones route
Just out of interested, Nicky and Anfield, how come you have Kings Ransom on your route??? This has to be the worst red ever made! (I even prefer bling bling to this now!)
My route is:
Games media (all 1,000,000 of them)
2 Pink Panthers
2 Jewel in the Crown
1 Mazzoma Coronation Street.
I dont usually play reds unless they are really showing. Too much time needed and huge risk of no profit. (even though the profit is big, should you get it).
My route is:
Games media (all 1,000,000 of them)
2 Pink Panthers
2 Jewel in the Crown
1 Mazzoma Coronation Street.
I dont usually play reds unless they are really showing. Too much time needed and huge risk of no profit. (even though the profit is big, should you get it).
streaky bacon?
its good for a quick steal off target practice red for 25 and a toggle climb after- if its really red and showing then force for crowns!
to be fair mate i hate it but its in the same pub as other reds and u gotta play both machines as if u win on one u r likely to win on other. Its not in the same league as bling bling(i am offended) its in the same league as sub zero!!! :P :P
to be fair mate i hate it but its in the same pub as other reds and u gotta play both machines as if u win on one u r likely to win on other. Its not in the same league as bling bling(i am offended) its in the same league as sub zero!!! :P :P
I agree - Bling Bling and Sub Zero are incomparable.
Give me Bling Bling anytime! They are readable, streakable, and the Safe Cash is altogether avoidable (unlike on SZ).
I'm trying to think of more words ending in -able, but I won't as that would be lamentable.
D'oh!
Give me Bling Bling anytime! They are readable, streakable, and the Safe Cash is altogether avoidable (unlike on SZ).
I'm trying to think of more words ending in -able, but I won't as that would be lamentable.
D'oh!
This machine may at times offer a choice where the player has every chance of bankruptcy
I mean lets just say how many times on sub zero or kings ransom would you get 3 jp in a row ie if your 1st top was only 25 would you get another two???
Not in my experience, bling bling is far better at giving huge tops or 3 25s in a row. I love the cancel button on bling bling too when its going off its nuts
Not in my experience, bling bling is far better at giving huge tops or 3 25s in a row. I love the cancel button on bling bling too when its going off its nuts
>>FEATURE AWARDED<<
Pause.
Phones light up white
"This will be THE most sensational posting!"
Bring, bring bring! Phones now red.
Hey lucky you. You, yes you, that's YOU reading this now have been awarded an invincible posting. Keep reading to the end for the Mega Streak.
The End. (Well gambled).
"I've got a feeling you're going to go away with a huge, huge number of words."
So here we are!
Hark at all you Red heads. I played a Fun Nudging Criminals today that was full and reddy. Nearly £70 in and yeah fair play, I've had a few big nudge wins, but nothing has gone up. It was being really harsh on the numbers gamble though. I mean REALLY harsh. In fact I'd go as far (Matt!) to say I'd rather roll a 2 first go on a Deal or no Deal and die than have this nonsense. I mean I wasn't too bothered, it was showing, but I just thought 'why oh why so harsh?'. It'd hardly inspire a casual player, total lack of gameplay. This is a £25 jackpot by the way, so it was quite surprising that £70 in and it offered jackpot on a 6, something clicked inside me and I decided to collect. Heaven knows why. So jackpot and then it was a battle where the reds disappeared, came back, disappeared, came back a bit as mixed heads were there etc. A battle to scoop back my money plus small, very small interest. £3. That was after two back to back hot shots. Messy play by me, but it makes you wonder, was the £85 top £5 away, or would it have done me to % for a £30ish loss?
I can't say I rave about Reds. They're ok if they're there, but round by me, they're rarely there. I play the safer ones.........that said I tried a Sub Zero. Bit of a mistake. I was about to leave the pub when some bloke threw his pint at Noel Edmonds. Not very civilised. Beat the banker or drown the banker or intoxicate the banker?
Anyway, after things had dried out a bit and said (or sad) bloke had been carted out pub by the missus. I tried a coin, no joy as the machine had drunk some beer and wasn't hungry. Whipped in a note and £4 for a board that got me Deal or no Deal from a multi add. Chanced my luck and left with 1p and Mega Streak with an offer of £14.xx. As my luck felt out (with a poor run of the nap on the Reds) and also as the coin mech was knackered and I didn't want it to run dry with value in the machine, I played it safe and took the slightly below par £15. No repeat. [MEGA STREAK (typical)} £2 later blue streak from boxes for £15 and then £3 in for £4 and I left it.
What's the point of all this? I don't know. Reds are annoying sometimes. You knew that already. I just told you again. There we go.
I lost on Reds I won on BFG. Play BFG they're much better.
Pause.
Phones light up white
"This will be THE most sensational posting!"
Bring, bring bring! Phones now red.
Hey lucky you. You, yes you, that's YOU reading this now have been awarded an invincible posting. Keep reading to the end for the Mega Streak.
The End. (Well gambled).
"I've got a feeling you're going to go away with a huge, huge number of words."
So here we are!
Hark at all you Red heads. I played a Fun Nudging Criminals today that was full and reddy. Nearly £70 in and yeah fair play, I've had a few big nudge wins, but nothing has gone up. It was being really harsh on the numbers gamble though. I mean REALLY harsh. In fact I'd go as far (Matt!) to say I'd rather roll a 2 first go on a Deal or no Deal and die than have this nonsense. I mean I wasn't too bothered, it was showing, but I just thought 'why oh why so harsh?'. It'd hardly inspire a casual player, total lack of gameplay. This is a £25 jackpot by the way, so it was quite surprising that £70 in and it offered jackpot on a 6, something clicked inside me and I decided to collect. Heaven knows why. So jackpot and then it was a battle where the reds disappeared, came back, disappeared, came back a bit as mixed heads were there etc. A battle to scoop back my money plus small, very small interest. £3. That was after two back to back hot shots. Messy play by me, but it makes you wonder, was the £85 top £5 away, or would it have done me to % for a £30ish loss?
I can't say I rave about Reds. They're ok if they're there, but round by me, they're rarely there. I play the safer ones.........that said I tried a Sub Zero. Bit of a mistake. I was about to leave the pub when some bloke threw his pint at Noel Edmonds. Not very civilised. Beat the banker or drown the banker or intoxicate the banker?
Anyway, after things had dried out a bit and said (or sad) bloke had been carted out pub by the missus. I tried a coin, no joy as the machine had drunk some beer and wasn't hungry. Whipped in a note and £4 for a board that got me Deal or no Deal from a multi add. Chanced my luck and left with 1p and Mega Streak with an offer of £14.xx. As my luck felt out (with a poor run of the nap on the Reds) and also as the coin mech was knackered and I didn't want it to run dry with value in the machine, I played it safe and took the slightly below par £15. No repeat. [MEGA STREAK (typical)} £2 later blue streak from boxes for £15 and then £3 in for £4 and I left it.
What's the point of all this? I don't know. Reds are annoying sometimes. You knew that already. I just told you again. There we go.
I lost on Reds I won on BFG. Play BFG they're much better.